Aviation's Lesson for Industrial Real Estate

Uptime Is Built on Access, Redundancy, and the Right Facility

An aircraft can be extraordinarily capable and still be useless when one required part, technician, document, or suitable space is unavailable.

Aviation makes the cost of downtime visible. Every movement depends on coordinated systems: maintenance, fueling, inspections, weather, scheduling, ground access, parts, trained labor, and regulatory compliance.

Industrial property works the same way, although the consequences are often hidden in a tenant's operating results.

The value of a facility is not just what fits inside it. It is how reliably the property enables the operation to continue.

Airports are operating systems

The Federal Aviation Administration identifies nearly 3,300 public-use airports in the national system, including commercial, reliever, and selected general aviation airports. Those airports perform different roles, but many support an ecosystem extending well beyond runways and passenger terminals.

That ecosystem can include:

  • Aircraft storage and hangars
  • Maintenance, repair, and refurbishment
  • Fueling and ground services
  • Parts and tooling inventory
  • Avionics and technical specialists
  • Flight training and emergency response
  • Cargo and time-sensitive logistics
  • Aerospace manufacturing and testing

The facilities are connected. A hangar without appropriate access, a maintenance shop without parts storage, or an industrial building separated from the airport by poor roads may be less useful than its specifications suggest.

Access is a system, not a distance

“Near the airport” is not enough.

For an aeronautical user, access may mean direct ramp or taxiway connectivity. For a parts distributor, it may mean reliable highway access to several airports. For an aerospace supplier, proximity to customers, skilled labor, utilities, and secure shipping may matter more than being on airport property.

FAA rules also distinguish aeronautical and non-aeronautical use at federally obligated airports. Hangars designated for aviation use generally cannot be treated like ordinary self-storage or flex buildings. Lease terms, permitted uses, airport sponsor obligations, safety, and access can materially affect value.

That makes legal and operational diligence as important as physical inspection.

Redundancy has a real estate footprint

Aviation operators plan around contingencies because weather, maintenance findings, parts shortages, or scheduling conflicts can disrupt an otherwise sound plan.

Real estate redundancy may include:

  • Space to hold critical parts and tooling
  • More than one viable supplier or service provider nearby
  • Backup power or communications
  • Alternative vehicle and freight access
  • Enough apron, yard, or staging capacity to absorb irregular operations
  • Flexible bays that allow maintenance and storage demands to change

Redundancy costs money. But so does downtime. The relevant question is whether the property reduces an operational risk that the user is willing and able to pay to avoid.

Specialized does not have to mean single-purpose

Aviation buildings can be highly specialized. Door dimensions, clear span, fire protection, ramp access, ceiling height, ventilation, floor loading, security, and hazardous-material requirements can sharply limit replacement users.

We prefer specialization that rests on a durable airport or aerospace ecosystem—not on one aircraft type, one operator, or one short-term contract.

Off-airport flex and industrial buildings may sometimes offer greater reuse. A property serving avionics, parts, tooling, fabrication, or ground-equipment maintenance may also serve defense, robotics, advanced manufacturing, and logistics users.

That overlap is particularly relevant in Arizona, Texas, Colorado, and Wyoming, where aviation and aerospace activity intersects with defense, technology, energy, and manufacturing.

What aviation teaches us to inspect

We apply an aviation-style checklist to specialized industrial properties:

  • Mission: What must the tenant accomplish here?
  • Access: Can people, aircraft, trucks, parts, and emergency services reach the facility efficiently?
  • Uptime: Which building systems can stop the operation?
  • Redundancy: What happens when a system, route, or vendor fails?
  • Compliance: Are use, leases, zoning, airport rules, fire protection, and environmental conditions aligned?
  • Configuration: Can the building accommodate changing equipment or tenants?
  • Support network: Are labor, parts, maintenance, and customers nearby?
  • Exit: Who is the next credible user if the current one leaves?

The checklist is useful far beyond aviation. It forces underwriting to begin with the operation rather than the brochure.

Our investment conclusion

Aviation rewards preparation because failures compound quickly. The same principle applies to industrial real estate.

We are interested in hangar, maintenance, flex, storage, and airport-adjacent properties when their value rests on demonstrated demand, appropriate use rights, practical access, and more than one credible path to occupancy.

We do not assume that every airport property is scarce or that specialized construction automatically deserves a premium. We want the facility's operating value to be clear—and the investment to work under conservative assumptions.

Bring us the property that protects uptime

Draymoor Ventures is seeking aviation and aerospace-support properties in Arizona, Texas, Colorado, and Wyoming, including hangars, maintenance facilities, flex buildings, parts storage, and airport-adjacent industrial assets.

If the facility keeps aircraft, parts, technicians, or critical ground operations moving, we want to understand its mission and constraints.

Share an opportunity: Steven@DraymoorVentures.com

Sources

  1. Federal Aviation Administration, National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems. https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/npias
  2. Federal Aviation Administration, General Aviation Airports Reports. https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/ga_study
  3. Federal Aviation Administration, Frequently Asked Questions on FAA Policy on Use of Hangars at Obligated Airports. https://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_compliance/hangar_use
  4. Federal Aviation Administration, Revenue Producing Facility Policy. https://www.faa.gov/airports/central/aip/revenue_producers
  5. Federal Aviation Administration, The Economic Impact of U.S. Civil Aviation. https://www.faa.gov/2024-economic-impact-report.pdf
Previous
Previous

What Motorsports Teaches About Site Selection

Next
Next

The Hidden Real Estate Behind Reshoring